Dartmouth withdraws Tengatenga’s appointment as foundation dean

ens_081513_jamesTengatenga3

Former Southern Malawi Bishop James Tengatenga will not become the dean of Dartmouth College’s Tucker Foundation, the college has announced. Photo: Anglican Communion News Service

[Episcopal News Service] Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire, has withdrawn the appointment of former Southern Malawi Bishop James Tengatenga as dean of its Tucker Foundation saying that his past comments about homosexuality “have compromised his ability to serve effectively.”

Meanwhile, some North American church leaders are surprised and saddened by the decision, saying that they know Tengatenga as a bridge-builder and reconciler who has a deep understanding of the complex issues concerning human sexuality.

Tengatenga, a long-standing member and current chair of the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC), the Anglican Communion’s main policy-making body, announced in mid-July that after 15 years as bishop of Southern Malawi he was tendering his resignation to become the Virginia Rice Kelsey Dean of the William Jewett Tucker Foundation at Dartmouth College from Jan. 1, 2014.

After some members of the Dartmouth community and other groups expressed concerns about Tengatenga’s appointment, Philip J. Hanlon, college president, said in an Aug. 14 statement that he felt it was important for him to meet with the bishop and ask “tough questions about his earlier statements on homosexuality” and “his leadership within an Anglican Church in Africa that has often been hostile regarding gay rights.”

It was not clear to which earlier statements Hanlon was referring, but in an Aug. 15 e-mail to Episcopal News Service, Tengatenga said those protesting his appointment “have used selectively what I said in 2004” when he was quoted as opposing the election and ordination of the Rt. Rev. Gene Robinson as the first openly gay bishop in the Anglican Communion. Tengatenga has said that his understanding of human sexuality has since evolved and that he now considers all people equal regardless of their sexual orientation.

Tengatenga, who was elected as ACC chair in 2009, and also became chair of the Anglican Communion Standing Committee, told ENS on Aug. 15 that he is “saddened” by Dartmouth’s decision. “They have chosen to trust bigotry over truth and justice.”

He said that the college has yet to inform him formally of their decision but that once they do he intends to seek legal counsel.

One of the groups that countersigned the protest is the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. “Of all the groups to take the lead against a black person on flimsy grounds,” Tengatenga said. “So much for the advancement of colored people … It is sad that such an institution can stoop so low.”

Connecticut Bishop Ian Douglas has known Tengatenga for close to two decades in a variety of capacities across the Anglican Communion, most recently in his leadership of the Anglican Consultative Council.

“James is fundamentally committed to the belief that differences are a gift from God and we are at our God-given best when we come together to serve God’s mission of restoration and reconciliation,” said Douglas, who serves on the Anglican Communion Standing Committee alongside Tengatenga. “I am deeply saddened that Dartmouth has turned its back on such a fine Christian leader who has demonstrated over and over again the inclusive love of God in Christ.”

Bishop Michael Ingham, whose Diocese of New Westminster in Canada has been blessing same-sex relationships since 2002, wrote to Hanlon saying that he believes the decision to withdraw Tengatenga’s appointment “to be quite wrong … He is an African first, proud of his roots and culture, but also widely travelled, scholarly, wise, and sophisticated in his grasp of the complex realities of justice. He has a far greater understanding of how to bridge cultural differences towards the goal of reconciliation than most of us in North America.”

Tengatenga recently visited the New Westminster diocese as the keynote speaker for its annual convention. He “came here to build bridges between Africa and Canada on the contentious matter of homosexuality,” wrote Ingham. “He received three standing ovations. Mr. President, I can assure you no one with homophobic opinions would have received such a welcome here. His wisdom, humor, intelligence, and grace far transcends the narrow confines of a single issue.”

Dartmouth, Ingham said, “has lost an extraordinary opportunity to forge a relationship with Africa through one of its outstanding intellectual leaders.”

New Hampshire Bishop Rob Hirschfeld said he had been eager to welcome Tengatenga as a brother bishop to his diocese.

“As Christians, our posture is one of hospitality; that’s how we are called to be,” he wrote in an e-mail to ENS. “I also recognize that it was a bold appointment considering how politically charged American colleges tend to be. As an alumnus, I have some familiarity of the climate at Dartmouth. Bishop James’s effectiveness, despite his conciliatory work in the Anglican Communion and his powerful statements of openness and support of the LBGTQ community, would also have been complicated by the apparent indefinite role of the Tucker Foundation.

“If the Dartmouth College decision took place within the councils of the church, I think we would have benefited from some holy conversation that would have led to a deepening of communion and reconciliation. I would welcome that. We see that such a conversation is probably not what the college administration bargained for in filling this vacancy, so the revoking of the appointment is sad, but understandable. I pray that some healthy reflection will proceed out of this whole event.”

Hanlon said that in his meeting with Tengatenga, the bishop spoke about his “inspiring life of service to some of the world’s most vulnerable people, especially victims of HIV-AIDS [and] … his commitment to gay rights and how he has worked to support the LGBTQ community in Malawi in the ways that are most effective, given the country’s cultural context.”

But after “much reflection and consultation” with senior leaders at Dartmouth, Hanlon said it had become clear that Tengatenga’s past comments about homosexuality “and the uncertainty and controversy they created have compromised his ability to serve effectively as dean of Tucker.”

Tengatenga had issued a statement on July 18 saying that he supports marriage equality and equal rights for everyone.

“Let me state unequivocally and categorically that I consider all people equal regardless of their sexual orientation,” said Tengatenga. “The dignity of all should be honored and respected. As is the case with many people, my ideas about homosexuality have evolved over time. I’m not ashamed to say that, but I also think I’m not alone…”

Tengatenga said he felt it was important to offer some historical context and noted that the changing attitudes on human sexuality, especially in the United States, “have been staggering. The 2003 consecration of V. Gene Robinson as Episcopal bishop of New Hampshire represented an extraordinary gift because it forced people — from parishioners to bishops to people outside the church — to think carefully and critically about the issue of homosexuality and gay rights. As a result, many of us came to very different understandings of the faith and the gospel.”

“So, let me be clear. I support marriage equality and equal rights for everyone, and I look forward to working with everyone at Dartmouth—everyone. I believe that discrimination of any kind is sinful. When I say that I am committed to the human rights of all, I mean all.”

But Tengatenga’s statement was not enough to allay concerns and Hanlon concluded that “the foundation and Dartmouth’s commitment to inclusion are too important to be mired in discord over this appointment. Consequently, we have decided not to move forward with the appointment of Dr. Tengatenga as dean of the Tucker Foundation.”

Dartmouth will now develop plans for interim leadership at Tucker and convene a task force charged with making recommendations as to the foundation’s mission and organizational structure. On its website, the foundation says, it “educates Dartmouth students for lives of purpose and ethical leadership, rooted in service, spirituality, and social justice.”

Tengatenga has said that he is not withdrawing his resignation as bishop of Southern Malawi but that he has not decided what he will do next. “It is in the Lord’s hands,” he told ENS.

– Matthew Davies is an editor/reporter of the Episcopal News Service.

Comments

  1. Edgar Kinnier says:

    Another example of correctness gone wild. Dartmouth should have known all of this Bishops stands as they went through the appointment process.

  2. We have worked in Malawi on HIV, TB, malaria and other health issues nonstop since 2001. In all that time I have known Bishop Tengatenga to be an open, thoughtful, intelligent, and caring man. As he says, his position on gay men and lesbians has changed. He went from a deeply African perspective to a decidedly counter-cultural and more just one. I greatly admire Dartmouth, but I believe they lost badly when they deprived themselves of this man of nearly unique integrity.
    Bill Rankin, President Emeritus, Global AIDS Interfaith Alliance (GAIA,) San Francisco

  3. Joseph D Herring says:

    As a son of Dartmouth, and as a priest of the Episcopal Church, I find President Hanlon’s decision
    very painful. Bishop Douglas has it right. We needed some holy conversation about this. Dartmouth is trying its best to be a major player in the struggle for a more inclusive society. So also is Bishop Tengatenga. Both Dartmouth and the Church have work to do.
    Joe Herring,’55

  4. Gene Bourquin says:

    Why does the liberal church consistently think that anti-gay statements and attitude do not rise to the level of true concern? It is the mark of truly second class status when lip service leads to inaction or protests against action. In 2011 this Bishop declare his province “total against homosexuality.” If his statements were against races of peoples or other groups, would I be reading, “I find President Hanlon’s decision very painful . . . ” I don’t think so. As a gay Anglican I am just about feed up with the listening and discerning about my nature and my equality as a human being and a member of the body of Christ.

    • Justin Cheng says:

      With all due respect, would you think it fair if statements you made 10 years ago, when you had a different position, should be used against you right now? We do believe in repentance and transformation as Christians, right? Bishop James has said that he supports marriage equality and LGBT rights now, which is extraordinary considering that he is a bishop from Africa. Should we not be quick to commend and praise and slow to condemn and reject?

      BTW, I’m a gay Anglican as well.

  5. Thomas Connolly says:

    Bigotry on the left is as alive and well as it is on the right. Just how far back in time does one’s praxis, theoria and polesis have to be lily white at Dartmouth?

  6. Gene Bourquin says:

    2011 was two years ago. I believe in forgiveness. Of course, I am a Christian. We’re talking about his fitness for a job.

    You are correct, Justin, that perhaps I am too quick too judge. But I feel like the person who has judged less, and harmed less.

  7. Lawrence johnson '75 says:

    Hanlon’s clumsy, heavy handed decision has resulted in a sad day for Dartmouth , Anglicanism and Christianity. Opportunity lost for guiding the esteemed Tucker Foundation from an Anglican perspective. Also , it would have been most interesting to learn about Bishop Tengatenga’s perspective regarding the Islamist slavery and Christianicide that is is paining Africa so greatly.
    He put himself at great personal risk for evolving to support gay marriage in the African context.
    Now Hanlon rewards him with limbo, bowing to the alter of classic narcissistic political correctness.
    I’ll give President Hanlon an earful when I’m next up at Dartmouth !

  8. Rev. Mark H. Hatch says:

    As a graduate of Dartmouth College and an Episcopal Priest, I am ashamed and embarassed. The college and its new President have some very serious soul searching to do.

  9. Robert Stiefel says:

    Very confusing and confused situation. What did Bishop Tengatenga actually say in 2011 regarding human rights in his own country? Why did the leadership of Dartmouth not engage with him on this topic openly during the selection process? If the Bishop now says to the world that he supports equality for all, what evidence is there that he may be speaking falsely? All in all, Dartmouth College looks very bad at this point, a school led by administrators who do not know how to administrate. They should have consulted Bishop Ingram and Bishop Hirschfeld before making and announcing such a drastic decision, if only as a matter of simple courtesy. If the administrators of Dartmouth aren’t sure of the mission of the Tucker Foundation at this point, they certainly should have worked through that issue with outside counsel before considering any candidates to begin with. (From a priest in the Diocese of NH)

  10. The comments of Bishop Tengatenga made after the termination of his appointment as dean, as cited in this article, thoroughly support Dartmouth College’s decision to revoke his appointment. He slams the College for “having chosen to trust bigotry”. He plays the race card freely in order to denigrate the NAACP, as if he deserves the appointment because of his race, and takes a swipe at the NAACP as “stoop[ing] so low”. To me it appears clear that the NAACP is most concerned about the advancement of colored people who deserve to be advanced, in the words of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., “because of the content of their character”. A bishop in God’s church should not be “an African first”, s/he should be a person of God first. The reason for the existence of the church – any church, any religion, is to enable all people to put God first.

    As for the consecration of Bishop Robinson, it is done and by vast majority of General Convention. And, just as Bishop Robinson has said in the past, such as to former Bishop Duncan, “You keep talking about genitals and I am talking about the heart.” A person of God puts the heart first because that is where God lives in all of us. Jesus said, love God first, and love one another, and he said everyone will know we are his disciples “if we have love for one another”. There is enough clear evidence in this article alone to not only revoke this appointment as dean, but to question the appropriateness of Bishop Tengatenga wearing a collar with a shirt of any color.

    As a proud and loyal member of the Episcopal Church of the USA and Anglican Communion, this article has pushed me beyond the brink of diplomatic silence to decrying such behavior and attitudes as these, yet another African bishop, making their imperious stands in our provinces. Yes, this is a secular college circumstance, but he uses his collar to throw his weight around even in this secular circumstance. ECUSA stands in prophetic witness and spiritual wisdom to God’s spiritual presence equally in all persons, far beyond Bishop Tengatenga’s weak alleged consideration of all people being equal. In the USA equality of people is the secular law, and we do not need an African bishop to approve it. Since the beginning of Christian missionaries going to Africa, African theologians have said thanks for bringing us the Bible, now take your cultures and go home. It appears we have come historically and directionally full circle.

    As for the “flims[iness]” of the NAACP, someone should mention to Bishop Tengatenga that tomorrow in Washington DC commemorations begin for the 50th anniversary of Rev. Dr. King’s “I have a dream” speech, and the District is filling with people as I write this. He should learn the history of the NAACP and he would likely try to retract these comments as he does his previous ones. I am proud of our educational system in the US and this reversed decision by Dartmouth College is one example of why. I am proud of the spiritual wisdom and courage of ECUSA, and the consecration of our beloved Bishop Robinson, Presiding Bishop Jefferts-Schori, and others, are examples of why. I sit in the pews with new young families coming into the church and saying that the Episcopal Church is the kind of environment in which they want to raise their children. I am proud of the enlightening and evolving history of our country, and Rev. Dr. King and the NAACP are examples of reasons why. Bishop Tengatenga’s post-revocation comments serve very effectively to confirm the objections to his pre-appointment comments. All he did was play the same game from a different deck of cards.

    • Rev. Mike Neal says:

      Are you serious Peg, come on……………………….Bishop “T” is a wonderful Christian, and he doesn’t bend the “Gospel”, he got the ax because he doesn’t conform to the West crooked theology, plain and simple.

Speak Your Mind

*

Full names required. Read our Comment Policy. General comments and suggestions about Episcopal News Service, as well as reports of commenting misconduct, can be e-mailed to news@episcopalchurch.org.